UN Trade Chief Urges US to Reevaluate Tariffs Impacting Developing Nations
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Secretary-General Rebeca Grynspan has urged the United States to reassess its tariff policies, warning they disproportionately harm the world’s poorest nations. Speaking at a Geneva forum this week, Grynspan emphasized how high U.S. import duties stifle economic growth in developing countries, exacerbating global inequality. The appeal comes amid rising trade tensions and calls for systemic reforms to promote fairer international commerce.
The Human Cost of Trade Barriers
UNCTAD data reveals that least-developed countries (LDCs) face an average U.S. tariff rate of 8.6%—three times higher than duties applied to major economies. For critical sectors like textiles and agriculture, rates exceed 15%, crippling export-dependent nations. Bangladesh, for instance, paid $1.2 billion in U.S. tariffs in 2022 alone, equivalent to 40% of its annual healthcare budget.
“These tariffs aren’t just numbers on a spreadsheet—they translate into fewer schools, fewer hospitals, and deeper poverty traps,” said Dr. Kwame Owusu, a Ghanaian economist specializing in trade policy. “When a farmer in Mali pays 20% to sell cotton to the U.S., but a French manufacturer pays 2%, that’s not free trade—it’s systemic marginalization.”
Economic Ripple Effects and Lost Opportunities
A 2023 World Bank study estimates that reducing U.S. tariffs on LDC exports by half could lift 5.3 million people out of extreme poverty by 2030. Key findings include:
- Export declines: Sub-Saharan Africa lost $6 billion in potential exports due to U.S. and EU tariffs since 2018
- Investment chilling: Every 1% tariff increase correlates with a 2.7% drop in foreign direct investment to affected nations
- Gender disparities: Women-owned businesses in developing countries are 34% more likely to face trade barriers
The U.S. Perspective: Security vs. Solidarity
U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai has defended tariffs as necessary for protecting domestic industries and national security. “Our trade policies must balance global cooperation with American workers’ interests,” she stated during a recent Congressional hearing. The Biden administration maintains that some tariffs—particularly on steel and aluminum—are vital for countering China’s market distortions.
However, critics argue this approach conflates geopolitical rivalries with development needs. “Slapping the same tariffs on Rwandan coffee as Chinese steel makes no moral or economic sense,” countered former WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy. “The U.S. could adopt graduated tariffs based on a country’s GDP per capita—a solution that protects both markets and livelihoods.”
Alternative Pathways Forward
UNCTAD proposes three pragmatic reforms:
- Extending the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) to cover 100% of LDC exports
- Implementing tariff exemptions for climate-friendly goods like solar panels
- Creating a multilateral fund to compensate nations losing tariff revenues
Ethiopia’s experiment with tariff-free industrial parks demonstrates the potential. After the U.S. granted duty-free access for apparel in 2020, the country attracted $500 million in new factories, creating 75,000 jobs—60% for women.
The Geopolitical Stakes of Fair Trade
With China expanding its influence through tariff-free initiatives like the Belt and Road Forum, analysts warn the U.S. risks losing soft power. “When America slams doors, Beijing rolls out red carpets,” noted geopolitical strategist Thandiwe Mbeki. “Every tariff dispute pushes developing nations toward alternative supply chains.”
The upcoming G20 summit presents a critical opportunity. Brazil has pledged to make tariff equity a centerpiece agenda item, while India seeks consensus on digital service taxes that could offset lost tariff revenues.
What Comes Next?
Stakeholders are watching three key developments:
- The U.S. International Trade Commission’s August review of GSP eligibility
- EU negotiations to expand “Everything But Arms” duty-free access
- Potential WTO rulings on national security-based tariffs
As climate disasters and debt crises escalate, the moral imperative grows clearer. “Trade policy is development policy,” Grynspan concluded. “In an interconnected world, prosperity cannot be zero-sum.” Readers can track policy changes through UNCTAD’s Global Trade Watch dashboard and advocate for equitable reforms.
See more CCTV News Daily